You’re trying to reduce waste while corporations spill oil into the ocean. Here’s who’s really at fault and how to hold them accountable.

Let's get serious. Ditching your plastic straw is not going to save the world. The problem is the companies that make plastic straws. For too long now, the sustainability movement has been about individuals changing their lifestyles to avoid single-use plastics and excessive consumerism and reduce personal emissions. While this has sprouted a collective action towards prioritizing sustainability, the issue of excessive waste and climate change has grown. There is a perception of these companies as looming titans destroying the world, and in some ways, they have.

Here are the top offenders of environmental degradation:

Chevron is among the eight investor-owned corporations producing the most global carbon emissions. Exxon, BP, and Shell follow closely after. Together, these four international businesses have made over 10% of the world's carbon emissions since 1965!
Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Nestlé have been ranked as the world's top plastic polluters. This sets a record for them on their 5th consecutive year of topping the charts, according to Break Free From Plastic. The global Brand Audit report presents these companies as the leading plastic polluters for fueling the climate crisis.
Fashion is the third most polluting industry in the world. The fashion industry produces about 10% of our annual carbon footprint. This is equivalent to all of the world's international flights and maritime shipping. Fashion also consumes enough water to provide five million people with sufficient water yearly. This industry creates millions of tons of plastic and other waste that pollute our air and oceans.

We've been told that the solution is simple:

Move away from fast fashion.
Buy fewer but better-quality pieces of clothing.
Opt for sustainable brands that disclose their environmental impact transparently and make an attempt to reduce it.

The reality is that it's not about the solution being simple; this proposed solution makes change nearly impossible.

Why is it bad that companies don't take responsibility for their products?

The issue with customers taking responsibility for industry products that are harmful to the environment, particularly in industries like fashion and fossil fuels, lies in the imbalance of accountability.

Industries do not face sufficient consequences for producing products with adverse environmental effects. Inadequate regulations, lax enforcement, and limited penalties contribute to a lack of accountability for these industries.

Here are some other issues with companies not taking responsibility for their products:

Greenwashing Practices:
Some industries engage in greenwashing, presenting their products as more environmentally friendly than they are. This can mislead consumers, making it difficult for them to make informed choices and further obscuring the responsibility of the industries.
Economic Barriers:
Sustainable products are sometimes priced higher than their less eco-friendly counterparts. Economic considerations can hinder adopting environmentally responsible options, leaving customers with limited choices.
Inequitable Distribution of Responsibility:
Placing the responsibility on consumers to mitigate environmental harm can disproportionately impact specific demographics, particularly those with fewer resources. This creates an inequitable distribution of the burdens associated with environmental stewardship.
Need for Systemic Change:
Addressing the environmental impact of industries requires systemic changes, including stricter regulations, sustainable production practices, and corporate accountability measures. Relying solely on individual consumer actions could be more effective in achieving meaningful environmental improvements.
Collective Action:
While individual actions are valuable, solving specific industries' environmental challenges requires collective efforts. Governments, businesses, and consumers must work together to implement and support sustainable practices.
In summary, the issue revolves around the need for a more balanced distribution of responsibility between industries and consumers, coupled with systemic changes and increased accountability for environmentally harmful practices within these industries.

How can companies take responsibility for their environmental impact?

Designing products for longevity and reusability is the #1 way companies can ensure they do not contribute to the ever-growing waste problem. But what has to happen first? Companies must take responsibility for what happens to their products at their end-of-life.

Once again, this should not stay on the consumer. You should not feel guilty for a product you didn't make and must purchase to meet your needs.

Eco-responsible consumers already make great efforts to transform their footprint, reduce waste, and responsibly dispose of their purchases. Ultimately, now is the time for companies to create solutions before their products hit the market.

What are some viable solutions for companies to take environmental responsibility for their products?

Following Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations can guide manufacturers in managing product disposal responsibly.
Following circular economy practices, emphasizing product design for recycling and reusability will create sustainable closed-loop systems.
Creating product take-back programs specializing in e-waste management facilities contributes to responsible end-of-life practices.
Adopting sustainable sourcing practices for raw materials. This includes using environmentally friendly materials, reducing reliance on non-renewable resources, and ensuring responsible extraction methods.
Implementing eco-friendly manufacturing processes that minimize energy consumption, emissions, and waste. Innovations such as clean energy adoption and efficient water usage contribute to reducing the overall environmental footprint.
Choose easily recyclable or biodegradable materials at the end of their life cycle. This helps minimize the impact of waste on the environment.
Commit to using energy-efficient technologies in production facilities. Investing in renewable energy sources significantly reduces the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing processes.
Minimize packaging waste by adopting sustainable packaging solutions. This includes using recyclable materials, reducing unnecessary packaging, and exploring innovative packaging designs.
Implement carbon offset programs to compensate for unavoidable emissions. This involves investing in green projects that can reduce or capture the same amount of greenhouse gases to offset the company's carbon footprint.
Engage with stakeholders, including customers, employees, and communities, to understand their concerns and gather input on sustainable practices. Building a collaborative approach ensures a more comprehensive and inclusive sustainability strategy.
Allocate resources to research and development for eco-friendly technologies and materials. Innovation plays an inherent role in developing new environmentally sustainable and economically viable solutions.
Collaborate with other businesses, industry associations, and regulatory bodies to establish and adhere to common environmental standards. Working collectively can drive industry-wide change and promote best practices.
Conduct assessments of the impact of products throughout their life cycle. This includes analyzing raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, product use, and disposal.
Provide incentives for employees and suppliers to adopt and prioritize environmentally responsible practices. Recognition and rewards motivate stakeholders to contribute to sustainability goals actively.

By combining these strategies, companies can demonstrate a commitment to the environment while contributing to a more sustainable and resilient future.

Are you having a hard time shopping sustainably?

Imagine having access to a marketplace with vetted companies proving to be making a difference. No longer will you have to worry about doing the work to ensure products and services are "green," nor exhaust yourself trying to see through greenwashing tactics.

We aim to push humanity toward an economic model that lives in balance with nature and focuses on people, the planet, and prosperity for all. By highlighting innovative companies willing to step out of the status quo, we help you become a part of a living economy.

We are in the process of building our green economy and would like you to be the first to see it.

Sign up for our email newsletter here and receive a weekly update on eco insights, tips, and more.

Click here to access our blog for free articles on the best sustainable shopping recommendations.

With Carom, businesses, organizations, and people will have the opportunity to build a better economy that changes the world for the better for the prosperity of people and the planet.

Key Takeaways:

The issue with customers taking responsibility for industry products that are harmful to the environment, particularly in industries like fashion and fossil fuels, lies in the imbalance of accountability.
What are some viable solutions for companies to take environmental responsibility for their products?
Following Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regulations can guide manufacturers in managing product disposal responsibly.
Following circular economy practices, emphasizing product design for recycling and reusability will create sustainable closed-loop systems.
Creating product take-back programs specializing in e-waste management facilities contributes to responsible end-of-life practices.
By combining these strategies, companies can demonstrate a commitment to environmental responsibility and contribute to a more sustainable and resilient future.

Corporate Responsibility: A Solution for Climate Change